A series of year end polls have shown the Progressive Conservatives continue to place first in polling. The NDP are in second and the the Liberals are in third.
The Liberal support has risen slightly. It is the NDP and the Progressive Conservatives numbers that have moved in different directions.
Women seem to be changing their vote. Much like how women gave the Progressive Conservatives the thumbs down on bringing back the Jets, women are not that enthusiastic about the big money bringing a stadium to the University of Manitoba. In short, it is not an issue that moves them. I have no idea how the NDP can sell the deal but it is hard to buy for those who place higher value on other issues. As for men who might like a stadium, it is the costs and lack of any private backers like was seen on the MTS Centre that is suspending the huge cheers and possible support that might come from the project.
Greg Selinger knows that he can't afford to reveals the number being paid to David Asper and Creswin Properties and won't. Not very transparent and not likely to earn kudos from people for open government.
The Blue Bombers are on the hook to pay for a lot of the stadium. To do that, they will have to raise prices on every item beyond what some NDP blue collar supporters will find comfortable. Even their beer will be a premium price. Moreover, as long as the Bombers owe money to the province, the team cannot be bought by anyone.
As for the hydro project of bipole III, the costs remain nebulous and the reasons for running down the west side of the province hard to rationalize when the province is thinking of running a road up the east side. Hard to say one is better than the other environmentally when you don't even have an independent assessment done.
This time the PC support isn't a sudden wellspring from having a new leader. It has been steady growth over months and from the public having a chance to see Greg Selinger. There are no coattails for the NDP that they can ride on like they did with Gary Doer.
Can the NDP turn things around? Sure. It would help to have an economy on fire and a deficit that was being pared down to nothing. However, even then people will judge on the future. If they don't feel that the government looks to get a handle on spending or its priorities, they will drift away. For want of something different, they will look to a party that represents "change."
Voter fatigue is a real event in Manitoba. Most parties are done after 10 years in favour of someone else.
The PCs could still blow the election and do something dumb. Liberal votes could collapse by half. This would benefit the NDP. However, the NDP will have to do more than run a negative campaign and unleash their unofficial attacks on forums and blogs.
People are looking for change and that will require some innovative thinking and offering some vision.
Good post John,
ReplyDeleteOne thing though, is there a "real" and measurable Liberal vote in Manitoba at the provincial level? Much like the Winndego I believe it is more myth than fact...?
For the last 10 years, the Liberals vote in Manitoba has been a consistent 12-13%. It has risen just a hair recently.
ReplyDeleteThe NDP would need the vote for the Liberals to completely collapse by about at least half to really mitigate the gains the Tories have made at their expense. The last time the vote was that low was 1981 and the NDP was on the upswing with people wanting to really end Sterling Lyon's rule.
I don't believe the NDP is looking at the same momentum. They may gain a Liberal seat but ultimately, the Liberal vote might be stuck at a certain percentage that might not help the NDP hold off Tories gains elsewhere.
While this is a two party province for seats for the most part, there are people who still vote Liberal and probably always will.
I know is the absence of a choice other than NDP or PC, I might not vote at all.